Jurnal Health Sains: p–ISSN : 2723-4339 e-ISSN
: 2548-1398
Vol. 2, No. 9, September 2022
IMPACT OF THE COVID-19
PANDEMIC ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF HEALTH WORKERS
Lezi Mayang Sari, Mufdlilah, Mamnu’ah
Universitas
Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Email: lezimayangsarisari@gmail.com, mufdlilah.stikes@gmail.com, mamnuah@unisayogya.ac.id
artikel info |
abstract |
|||
Date received:: 1 August 2022 Revision date: 10 September 2022 Received date: 25 September
2022
Keywords: Covid-19;
Psychology; Health Workers |
Corona virus severe acute
respiratory syndrome was first released on December 31, 2019 the corona virus
spread to many countries around the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has put healthcare
workers around the world on the front lines, putting healthcare workers under
pressure. The purpose of this study is to review articles regarding the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychology of health workers. The
scoping review obtained data from Pubmed, Sciencedirect and Wiley with
Appraisal studies and using Critical Appraisal Hawker, using the PEOs
framework. nine articles discuss the impact of psychology on health workers.
Anxiety and depression are felt due to fatigue, busy working hours make work
results poor and health workers receive less pandemic training. Risk factors
for anxiety are fear of infection, community stigma so that health workers
feel a lack of social support and no access to mental health services such as
psychiatrists. The results of 9 articles that have been reviewed by
researchers have the impact of COVID 19 on health workers and risk factors
for anxiety during the COVID 19 period. The impact of covid on health workers
is anxiety and depression, negative work results and training in handling
COVID. The risk factors for anxiety are being a health worker, community
stigma and limited access to mental health services. |
Introduction
Severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus was first released on December 31, 2019 as
pneumonia and has since spread to many countries around the world which led the
World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a worldwide pandemic on March 1,
2020 (Si et al. , 2020). The rapid spread of COVID-19 has made national
public health interventions and quarantines implemented in most countries and
in recent months, containment measures, including mandatory quarantine and
long-term distancing can increase mental disorders, such as depression,
anxiety, mental disorders and stress. Dubey et al., 2020). The COVID-19
pandemic puts healthcare workers around the world as the front
line, making health workers work under pressure. Therefore, health workers are
an important component in addressing public health on a large scale. Therefore,
promoting the mental well-being of those exposed to COVID 19 needs to be done
immediately (El-hage et al., 2020) According to research by Antonijevic
et al., (2020) anxiety and fear
are the first symptoms that appear among health workers, then depression and
post-traumatic stress symptoms which then cause severe consequences and cause
long-term effects on the mental health of medical personnel. According to
research (Qasem Surrati et al., 2020) Chinese health workers reported 1257
health workers, especially nurses who were directly involved in handling
COVID-19 care, experienced psychological symptoms such as depression as much as
50% anxiety 45%, insomnia as much as 34% and mental stress 71,5%.old
nurse, who works at Jeselo Hospital committed suicide by jumping a river in
Italy (Chidiebere Okechukwu et al., 2020). The purpose of the scoping review is
to review articles regarding the impact of
theA 34-year old Italian nurse, who worked at
the San Gerardo Monza Hospital, committed suicide on the grounds that she
tested positivefoer COVID-19 and had been living the the
COVID-19 pandemic on health workers. great stress due to fear, distress
and
Has infected other people. In addition, a 49 year.
Research
methods
The method used is a scoping review, a systematic
review that can be used to identify results with an evidence base, as well as
the type of evidence available (Arksey
& O'alley, 2005). There are several
steps that must be carried out for a screening study:Mengidentifikasi
pertanyaan penelitian
A. Identify
relevant studies
The
inclusion criteria of this research are articles published in 2019-2022,
International journals, Articles on mental health of health workers, Articles
on psychology of health workers, Articles that explain COVID-19 and Articles
that explain stress on health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The
exclusion criteria were national journals, opinion articles, student mental
health journals and mental health journals for pregnant and neonatal women.
1)
Literature search
keyword
Elements |
Keyword |
Health
workers |
“health
workers” |
COVID -19 |
“COVID 19” |
“psychology
health workers” OR “health care works”OR”stress”OR”depression” |
B. Study selection
Researchers searched 3
databases, namely: Pubmed, ScienceDrirect and Wiley. Journals obtained from
Pubmed 361 journals,
journals obtained from
Sciencedirect 160 journals and from Wiley 99 journals, a total of 620 journals
were then imported into the
Mendeley bibliography machine. The findings of the number of articles and
the screening process will be discussed in the PRISMA flowchart as follows:
Figure1
PRISMA Flowchart
Results and Discussion
A. Impact
of COVID 19 on health
Anxiety
and depression
The
results of the article [1] found that most health workers reported a
significant increase in psychological problems where (54%) health workers
experienced anxiety and depressive symptoms (27%). In line with research by Adhikari et al., (2021)
which stated that the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 46.95% and
41.31% in health workers. The results of the research article [2] revealed that
levels of anxiety, depression and moderate stress were found to be 35.5%, 27.9%
and 72%, respectively, among health workers. This increased level of anxiety
and depression suggests a potential increase in stress-related disorders. In
line with the results of the study Preti et al., (2020) stated that health
workers, especially including doctors, nurses, and auxiliary staff, reported
symptoms of post-traumatic stress during an outbreak, with symptoms lasting
after 1-3 years in 10-40%. Depression symptoms were reported
27.5-50.7%, and severe anxiety symptoms 45% this is in line with the research
theory. The results of the research article [4]
where from 276 respondents (10.1%) showed increased symptoms of depression. the
prevalence of depressive symptoms was more common among nurses than among other
health professionals. 25.4% of respondents showed symptoms of anxiety. In line
with the research of Khanal et al., (2020) found that 41.9% of health workers
had symptoms of anxiety and 37.5% had symptoms of depression.
The article [9] found that nearly 43% of mental
health problems were work-related including fatigue, anxiety, stress,
depression and emotional distress. This is in line with the research by Huang
& Zhao, (2020) conducted by front-line health workers involved in the
direct diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 were associated
with a higher risk of depressive symptoms (P = 0.01), anxiety (OR, P <
.001), and distress (P < 0.001).
The
article [7] revealed the same thing where 36% of medical staff had mental
health disorders below the threshold, 34.4% of health workers had mild
disorders, 22.4% had moderate disorders and 6.2% had severe disorders. The
results of the two articles found are in line with the research of Gupta et
al., (2020) showing the prevalence of anxiety disorders is 37.3% among health
workers, with the majority of participants having mild anxiety and 8% of
participants experiencing depression. Work stress can be caused by various
factors such as a pandemic situation that can trigger stress on the pandemic
phenomenon, stress during this pandemic is a form of alertness to exposure to
the COVID-19 virus.dilingkungan kerja (Priyatna et al., 2021).
Other factors that cause stress are organizational factors
where personal protective equipment is depleted, concerns about not being able
to provide competent care, lack of access to up-to-date information and
communication, lack of certain medications, shortage of ventilators and
intensive care unit beds needed to treat surges. patients exposed to COVID 19
(Hasibuan, 2020).
B.
Negative results
The
results of the article [7] stated that health workers with changing work
schedules such as night shifts, rotating shifts and flexible hours also
resulted in employee absenteeism and intention to move. Thus, further mutations
from the COVID-19 pandemic will contribute to increased stress and resignations
as health workers. This is in line with the research of Kwaghe et al., (2021)
who expressed frustration and sometimes wanted to quit their job. Higher
perceived COVID-19 risk and induced psychological distress were associated with
burnout among healthcare employees. Burnout is usually caused by prolonged
stress at work and is associated with unfriendly working conditions, which have
an adverse effect on employee performance [7]. in line with the research of De
los Santos & Larague, (2021) showed that the perceived risk and fear of
contracting the virus resulted in demotivation and low morale among employees.
In addition, absenteeism from work is usually caused by the psychological
pressure felt to work meet the demands of work, work
discomfort, excessive workload, and long working hours. Working in the midst of
media and everyone's attention, the long duration of work may not be
unprecedented for health workers triggering negative psychological effects on
work outcomes. Psychological effects that are felt are emotional disturbances,
depression, stress, bad moods, panic attacks, phobias, symptoms of insomnia and
emotional exhaustion (Handayani et al., 2020).
C.
COVID 19 handling training
The
results of the study [9] stated that almost all doctors reported obtaining
information on COVID 19 from institutional or professional sources, 46% from
newspapers and TV. Almost half reported having received training for telephone
triage, while only 14% received formal training in the management of COVID 19.
The results of this study are not in line with the research conducted by Kotian
et al., (2020) who conducted a study on COVID-19 based on knowledge and
understanding among the public. medical imaging professionals, where they
reported that only 46.5% of participants had received training in the safe use
of PPE.
1.
Risk
factors for anxiety during COVID 19
2.
Become
a health worker
The
results of the study [1] most of the health workers fell ill due to COVID 19
but they considered the risk of infection as part of their job. Significantly
higher percentage of staff, more conflict among coworkers, increased workload, unusual
extra tasks and greater fear of infection. This is in line with the research of
Kwaghe et al., (2021) Accepting COVID-19 assignments is mostly expressed as a
call to duty based on specialization. They felt it was something they had to
do. However, this is not without initial fear and anxiety as expressed by some
respondents. The results of the study [3] that the risk factors for anxiety
were significantly related to the lack of training in controlling infection. In
contrast, severe stress levels are only associated with existing medical
problems. This is because medical practitioners on the front lines of the fight
against the virus are experiencing traumatic events arising from the patient's
condition and high mortality rate. There have been reports of traumatic stress
among medical practitioners in the fight against COVID 19, including cases of
medical practitioners taking their lives. This is in line with research by
Susanti et al., (2020) showing that health workers have a strong sense of
responsibility and teamwork when facing great pressure from heavy workloads,
lack of protective equipment and feelings of helplessness with patients. The
results of the research on risk factors for anxiety that occur due to the
limited availability of health resources and lack of training on pandemic
management are the reasons for higher levels of health workers in Pakistan.
article [7] also shows that most of the medical
workers experiencing high levels of fatigue amid the COVID pandemic adjusting
to new work schedules. The risk of infection of health workers can be reduced
by adequate precautions in health facilities. Primarily, this involves the use
of personal protective equipment (PPE) including gowns, gloves, face masks, and
face shields or goggles. Carefully putting on and taking off this equipment
remains the main defense, but requires adequate training and supervision. Findings
from the article [8] extension of health care emergencies requiring sustained
high levels of workload in the context of continued uncertainty on the
effectiveness of safety procedures and clinical management protocols have led
to a significant increase in symptoms of depression and fatigue among
healthcare workers. This is in line with the research of Ran et al., (2020) The risk of
infection in health workers seems to be related to shift duration and hand
hygiene. Longer working hours have a widespread negative influence on mental
health. While excessive working hours have become commonplace under disease
outbreaks, the health staff is very fragile, with mental health so fragile it
needs to be recognized as soon as possible to avoid further harm. Long work
duration triggers negative psychological effects including emotional
disturbance, depression, stress, low mood, irritability, panic attacks,
phobias, symptoms, insomnia, anger, and emotional exhaustion (Brooks et al., 2020).
3.
Community
stigma
Stigmatization,
fear of infection, and perception of high risk to their work. This is an issue
of great concern to medical care workers in the COVID-19 outbreak and other
similar pandemics, and has been shown to be associated with adverse
psychological outcomes [2]. In line with the study of Miconi et al., (2021)
health workers reported 17.3% of the sample reported having experienced
discrimination related to COVID 19, with the highest prevalence reported by
East and South Asian participants.
The
results of the article [3] reported the absence of social support. In addition,
the absence of social support can be attributed to the lack of security
measures taken by health agencies to protect their staff, thus resulting.
psychological tension of the participants, as they not only face the threat of
fighting the pandemic, but also from being attacked. In line with research
Adhikari et al., (2021) found that frontline worker status was associated with
stigma so that frontline workers were three times more likely to experience
stigma compared to those who did not work in the frontline. Infectious disease
outbreaks have been found to cause stigma among health care workers.
The global health emergency due to the
COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a social crisis marked by discriminatory
behavior and stigma against people who are considered suspects, diagnosed, or
survivors of the virus. Ironically, despite their role in treating COVID-19
sufferers, health workers are no exception to being stigmatized (Bagcchi, 2020).
Around the world, health workers also
experience negative actions that are a result of stigmatization, such as
harassment and violent attacks inside and outside their workplace which are
exacerbated by long working hours, psychological stress, burnout, and job
burnout that are often attached to work. they. Stigma and harassment leading to
intimidation and violence against health workers. These acts of violence have
been shown to increase stress levels and, consequently, exacerbate the
psychological sequelae of moral injury. People who have experienced
discrimination and stigma are at high risk for mental illness, including
anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicide (Brewis et al., 2020)
4.
Limited
access to mental health services
The results of the article [6] revealed the lack of
availability of psychologists and psychiatrists for psychological treatment for
distressed medical personnel, including less personalized sources of support
such as psychological materials andpsychological resources
available from the media. The availability of psychologists and psychiatrists
positively contributes to reducing mental health problems and physical
discomfort caused by risk factors such as exposure to close contact with COVID
19. This is not in line with the research of Kang et al.,
(2020) where in China psychological assistance (consisting
of volunteers) who had received training in psychological assistance in dealing
with the pandemic provided telephone guidance to help with mental health
issues.Hundreds of medical workers received these interventions, with good
response, and their provision extended to more people and hospitals.
The number of people suffering from mental health
impacts after the COVID-19 event is greater than the number of people who are
physically injured, and mental health effects can last much longer.
Nonetheless, mental health attracts far fewer personnel for planning and
resources (Allsopp et al., 2019). The Global
Mental Health Commission's observation that the use of digital technology can
provide a variety of mental health interventions (Patel et
al., 2018).
Psychological advice and guidance in printed resources
and disseminated in the media can provide a level of protection for medical and
nursing staff, improve mental health by reducing the impact of stress caused by
a high risk of infection (West et al., 2014)
Conclusion
The
results of the 9 articles that have been reviewed by researchers are the impact
of COVID 19 on health workers and risk factors for anxiety during the COVID 19
period. The impact of COVID on health workers is anxiety and depression,
negative work results and training in handling COVID. The factors that cause
COVID are being a health worker, community stigma and limited access to mental
health services.
Adhikari, S.
P., Rawal, N., Shrestha, D. B., Budhathoki, P., Banmala, S., Awal, S.,
Bhandari, G., Poudel, R., & Parajuli, A. R. (2021). Prevalence of Anxiety,
Depression, and Perceived Stigma in Healthcare Workers in Nepal During Later
Phase of First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey. Cureus, 13(6). Google Scholar
Allsopp, K.,
Brewin, C. R., Barrett, A., Williams, R., Hind, D., Chitsabesan, P., &
French, P. (2019). Responding to mental health needs after terror attacks. The BMJ, 366(August), 4–7. Google Scholar
Antonijevic,
J., Binic, I., Zikic, O., Manojlovic, S., Tosic-Golubovic, S., & Popovic,
N. (2020). Mental health of medical personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain and Behavior, 10(12), 1–9. Google Scholar
Arksey, H.,
& O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework.
International Journal of Social
Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616. Google Scholar
Arshad, M.
S., Hussain, I., Nafees, M., Majeed, A., Imran, I., Saeed, H., Hashmi, F. K.,
Akbar, M., Abrar, M. A., Ramzan, B., Chaudhry, M. O., Islam, M., Usman, A.,
Nisar, N., & Rasool, M. F. (2020). Assessing the impact of covid-19 on the
mental health of healthcare workers in three metropolitan cities of pakistan. Psychology Research and Behavior Management,
13, 1047–1055. Google Scholar
Bagcchi, S.
(2020). Stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 20(7), 782. Google Scholar
Brewis, A.,
Wutich, A., & Mahdavi, P. (2020). Stigma, pandemics, and human biology:
Looking back, looking forward. American
Journal of Human Biology, 32(5),
1–6. Google Scholar
Brooks, S.
K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N.,
& Rubin, G. J. (2020). The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to
Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence. SSRN
Electronic Journal, January.
Google Scholar
Chidiebere
Okechukwu, E., Tibaldi, L., & la Torre, G. (2020). The impact of COVID-19
pandemic on mental health of Nurses. Clinica
Terapeutica, 171(5),
e399–e400. Google Scholar
De los
Santos, J. A. A., & Labrague, L. J. (2021). The impact of fear of COVID-19
on job stress, and turnover intentions of frontline nurses in the community: A
cross-sectional study in the Philippines. Traumatology, 27(1),
52–59. Google Scholar
Di Tella, M.,
Romeo, A., Benfante, A., & Castelli, L. (2020). Mental health of healthcare
workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(6), 1583–1587. Google Scholar
Dubey, S.,
Biswas, P., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Dubey, M. J., Chatterjee, S., Lahiri,
D., & Lavie, C. J. (2020). Impacto Psicossocial do Covid-19. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical
Research and Reviews, 14(5),
779–788. Google Scholar
El-hage, W.,
Hingray, C., Lemogne, C., Yrondi, A., Brunault, P., & Bienvenu, T. (2020).
Health professionals faced with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic:
what are the risks for their mental health? Encephale, 46 (3)(January),
S73 – S80. Google Scholar
Frajerman,
A., Colle, R., Hozer, F., & Deflesselle, E. (2020). Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with
free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 .
The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s
public news and information . January.
Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K.,
Mehra, A., Niraula, A., Kafle, K., Deo, S. P., Singh, B., Sahoo, S., &
Grover, S. (2020). Prevalence of anxiety and depression among the healthcare
workers in Nepal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 54. Google Scholar
Handayani, R.
T., Kuntari, S., Darmayanti, A. T., Widiyanto, A., & Atmojo, J. T. (2020).
Faktor Penyebab Stres Pada Tenaga Kesehatan dan Masyarakat Saat Pandemi
Covid-19. Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa,
8(3), 353. Google Scholar
Hasibuan, A.
N. (2020). Faktor yang Berhubungan
dengan Stress Petugas Kesehatan Daam Penanganan Covid-19). Google Scholar
Huang, Y.,
& Zhao, N. (2020). Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19
resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel
coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier
Connect , the company ’ s public news and information. Esliver Psychiatry ResearchPsychiatry Research, 288(January), 2–3. Google Scholar
Kan L, Ma S,
Chen M, Yang J, Wang Y, Li R, & Yao L. (2020). Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among
medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease
outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun. [revista en Internet]
2020 [acceso 6 de mayo de 2022]; 2020(1),
1–8. Google Scholar
Kang, L., Li,
Y., Hu, S., Chen, M., Yang, C., Yang, B. X., Wang, Y., Hu, J., Lai, J., Ma, X.,
Chen, J., Guan, L., Wang, G., Ma, H., & Liu, Z. (2020). The mental health
of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(3), e14. Google Scholar
Khanal, P.,
Devkota, N., Dahal, M., Paudel, K., & Joshi, D. (2020). Mental health
impacts among health workers during COVID-19 in a low resource setting: A
cross-sectional survey from Nepal. Globalization
and Health, 16(1), 1–12.
Google Scholar
Kotian, R.
P., Faujdar, D., Kotian, S. P., & Brayal, D. (2020). article 1.
Kotian2020_Article_KnowledgeAndUnderstandingAmong. 1415–1420. Google Scholar
Kwaghe, A.
V., Kwaghe, V. G., Habib, Z. G., Kwaghe, G. V., Ilesanmi, O. S., Ekele, B. A.,
Umeokonkwo, C. D., & Balogun, M. S. (2021). Stigmatization and
psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on frontline healthcare Workers in
Nigeria: a qualitative study. BMC
Psychiatry, 21(1), 1–17.
Google Scholar
Lasalvia, A.,
Bonetto, C., Porru, S., Carta, A., Tardivo, S., Bovo, C., Ruggeri, M., &
Amaddeo, F. (2021). Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare
workers in a highly burdened area of north-east Italy. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 30. Google Scholar
Lasalvia, A.,
Rigon, G., Rugiu, C., Negri, C., Del Zotti, F., Amaddeo, F., & Bonetto, C.
(2022). The psychological impact of COVID-19 among primary care physicians in
the province of Verona, Italy: a cross-sectional study during the first
pandemic wave. Family Practice,
39(1), 65–73. Google Scholar
Miconi, D.,
Li, Z. Y., Frounfelker, R. L., Santavicca, T., Cénat, J. M., Venkatesh, V.,
& Rousseau, C. (2021). Ethno-cultural disparities in mental health during
the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study on the impact of exposure to the
virus and COVID-19-related discrimination and stigma on mental health across
ethno-cultural groups in Quebec (Canada). BJPsych Open, 7(1),
1–10. Google Scholar
Moyo, N.,
Bhappu, A. D., Bhebhe, M., & Ncube, F. (2022). Perceived Risk of COVID-19
and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic
Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 19(11),
6762. Google Scholar
Patel, V.,
Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D.,
Collins, P. Y., Cooper, J. L., Eaton, J., Herrman, H., Herzallah, M. M., Huang,
Y., Jordans, M. J. D., Kleinman, A., Medina-Mora, M. E., Morgan, E., Niaz, U.,
Omigbodun, O.,UnÜtzer, Jü. (2018). The Lancet Commission on global mental
health and sustainable development. The
Lancet, 392(10157),
1553–1598. Google Scholar
Preti, E., Di
Mattei, V., Perego, G., Ferrari, F., Mazzetti, M., Taranto, P., Di Pierro, R.,
Madeddu, F., & Calati, R. (2020). The Psychological Impact of Epidemic and
Pandemic Outbreaks on Healthcare Workers: Rapid Review of the Evidence. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(8). Google Scholar
Priyatna, H.,
Mu’in, M., Naviati, E., & Sudarmiati, S. (2021). Gambaran Tingkat Kecemasan
dan Stres Kerja Tenaga Kesehatan Puskesmas Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Holistic Nursing and Health Science, 4(2), 74–82. Google Scholar
Qasem
Surrati, A. M., Asad Mansuri, F. M., & Ayadh Alihabi, A. A. (2020).
Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers. Journal of Taibah University Medical
Sciences, 15(6),
536–543. Google Scholar
Ran, L.,
Chen, X., Wang, Y., Wu, W., Zhang, L., & Tan, X. (2020). Risk Factors of
Healthcare Workers with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study
in a Designated Hospital of Wuhan in China. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(16), 2218–2221. Google Scholar
Si, M., Su,
X., Jiang, Y., Wang, W., Gu, X., Ma, L., Li, J., Zhang, S., Ren, Z.-F., Liu,
Y.-L., & Qiao, Y.-L. (2020). The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on
Medical Care Workers in China. SSRN
Electronic Journal, 1–13. Google Scholar
Susanti, S.
S., Rachmalia, & Mayasari, P. (2020). Book Chapter: Advances in Community
And Disaster Nursing: Pencegahan dan Penatalaksanaan Keperawatan COVID-19. The Lancet Global Health, April, 19–21. Google Scholar
West, C. P.,
Dyrbye, L. N., Rabatin, J. T., Call, T. G., Davidson, J. H., Multari, A.,
Romanski, S. A., Henriksen Hellyer, J. M., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D.
(2014). Intervention to promote physicianwell-being, job satisfaction, and
professionalism a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(4),
527–533. Google Scholar
Copyright
holder: Lezi Mayang Sari,
Mufdlilah, Mamnu’ah (2022) |
First
publication right: Jurnal Health Sains |
This
article is licensed under: |