Jurnal Health Sains: p–ISSN : 2723-4339 e-ISSN : 2548-1398     

Vol. 2, No. 9, September 2022

 

IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF HEALTH WORKERS

 

Lezi Mayang Sari, Mufdlilah, Mamnu’ah

Universitas Aisyiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Email: lezimayangsarisari@gmail.com, mufdlilah.stikes@gmail.com, mamnuah@unisayogya.ac.id

 

artikel info

abstract

Date received::

1 August 2022

Revision date:

10 September 2022

Received date:  

25 September 2022                    

 


Keywords:

Covid-19; Psychology; Health Workers

Corona virus severe acute respiratory syndrome was first released on December 31, 2019 the corona virus spread to many countries around the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has put healthcare workers around the world on the front lines, putting healthcare workers under pressure. The purpose of this study is to review articles regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychology of health workers. The scoping review obtained data from Pubmed, Sciencedirect and Wiley with Appraisal studies and using Critical Appraisal Hawker, using the PEOs framework. nine articles discuss the impact of psychology on health workers. Anxiety and depression are felt due to fatigue, busy working hours make work results poor and health workers receive less pandemic training. Risk factors for anxiety are fear of infection, community stigma so that health workers feel a lack of social support and no access to mental health services such as psychiatrists. The results of 9 articles that have been reviewed by researchers have the impact of COVID 19 on health workers and risk factors for anxiety during the COVID 19 period. The impact of covid on health workers is anxiety and depression, negative work results and training in handling COVID. The risk factors for anxiety are being a health worker, community stigma and limited access to mental health services.

 


Introduction


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus was first released on December 31, 2019 as pneumonia and has since spread to many countries around the world which led the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a worldwide pandemic on March 1, 2020 (Si et al. , 2020). The rapid spread of COVID-19 has made national public health interventions and quarantines implemented in most countries and in recent months, containment measures, including mandatory quarantine and long-term distancing can increase mental disorders, such as depression, anxiety, mental disorders and stress. Dubey et al., 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic puts healthcare workers around the world as the front line, making health workers work under pressure. Therefore, health workers are an important component in addressing public health on a large scale. Therefore, promoting the mental well-being of those exposed to COVID 19 needs to be done immediately (El-hage et al., 2020) According to research by Antonijevic et al., (2020) anxiety and fear are the first symptoms that appear among health workers, then depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms which then cause severe consequences and cause long-term effects on the mental health of medical personnel. According to research (Qasem Surrati et al., 2020) Chinese health workers reported 1257 health workers, especially nurses who were directly involved in handling COVID-19 care, experienced psychological symptoms such as depression as much as 50% anxiety 45%, insomnia as much as 34% and mental stress 71,5%.old nurse, who works at Jeselo Hospital committed suicide by jumping a river in Italy (Chidiebere Okechukwu et al., 2020). The purpose of the scoping review is to review articles regarding the impact of  theA 34-year old Italian nurse, who worked at the San Gerardo Monza Hospital, committed suicide on the grounds that she tested positivefoer COVID-19 and had been living the the COVID-19 pandemic on health workers. great stress due to fear, distress and 

Has infected other people. In addition, a 49 year.

 

Research methods

The method used is a scoping review, a systematic review that can be used to identify results with an evidence base, as well as the type of evidence available (Arksey & O'alley, 2005). There are several steps that must be carried out for a screening study:Mengidentifikasi pertanyaan penelitian

A.  Identify relevant studies

       The inclusion criteria of this research are articles published in 2019-2022, International journals, Articles on mental health of health workers, Articles on psychology of health workers, Articles that explain COVID-19 and Articles that explain stress on health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The exclusion criteria were national journals, opinion articles, student mental health journals and mental health journals for pregnant and neonatal women.

1)        Literature search


Table 1

keyword


Elements

Keyword

Health workers

health workers

COVID -19

“COVID 19”

“psychology health workers” OR “health care works”OR”stress”OR”depression”


 

B.    Study selection

Researchers searched 3 databases, namely: Pubmed, ScienceDrirect and Wiley. Journals obtained from Pubmed 361 journals,

 

 

journals obtained from Sciencedirect 160 journals and from Wiley 99 journals, a total of 620 journals were then imported into the

 

 

Mendeley bibliography machine. The findings of the number of articles and the screening process will be discussed in the PRISMA flowchart as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 



 


Figure1

PRISMA Flowchart

 


Results and Discussion

A.  Impact of COVID 19 on health

     Anxiety and depression

       The results of the article [1] found that most health workers reported a significant increase in psychological problems where (54%) health workers experienced anxiety and depressive symptoms (27%). In line with research by Adhikari et al., (2021) which stated that the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 46.95% and 41.31% in health workers. The results of the research article [2] revealed that levels of anxiety, depression and moderate stress were found to be 35.5%, 27.9% and 72%, respectively, among health workers. This increased level of anxiety and depression suggests a potential increase in stress-related disorders. In line with the results of the study Preti et al., (2020) stated that health workers, especially including doctors, nurses, and auxiliary staff, reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress during an outbreak, with symptoms lasting after 1-3 years in 10-40%. Depression symptoms were reported 27.5-50.7%, and severe anxiety symptoms 45% this is in line with the research theory. The results of the research article [4] where from 276 respondents (10.1%) showed increased symptoms of depression. the prevalence of depressive symptoms was more common among nurses than among other health professionals. 25.4% of respondents showed symptoms of anxiety. In line with the research of Khanal et al., (2020) found that 41.9% of health workers had symptoms of anxiety and 37.5% had symptoms of depression.

              The article [9] found that nearly 43% of mental health problems were work-related including fatigue, anxiety, stress, depression and emotional distress. This is in line with the research by Huang & Zhao, (2020) conducted by front-line health workers involved in the direct diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 were associated with a higher risk of depressive symptoms (P = 0.01), anxiety (OR, P < .001), and distress (P < 0.001).

              The article [7] revealed the same thing where 36% of medical staff had mental health disorders below the threshold, 34.4% of health workers had mild disorders, 22.4% had moderate disorders and 6.2% had severe disorders. The results of the two articles found are in line with the research of Gupta et al., (2020) showing the prevalence of anxiety disorders is 37.3% among health workers, with the majority of participants having mild anxiety and 8% of participants experiencing depression. Work stress can be caused by various factors such as a pandemic situation that can trigger stress on the pandemic phenomenon, stress during this pandemic is a form of alertness to exposure to the COVID-19 virus.dilingkungan kerja (Priyatna et al., 2021).

       Other factors that cause stress are organizational factors where personal protective equipment is depleted, concerns about not being able to provide competent care, lack of access to up-to-date information and communication, lack of certain medications, shortage of ventilators and intensive care unit beds needed to treat surges. patients exposed to COVID 19 (Hasibuan, 2020).

B.     Negative results

       The results of the article [7] stated that health workers with changing work schedules such as night shifts, rotating shifts and flexible hours also resulted in employee absenteeism and intention to move. Thus, further mutations from the COVID-19 pandemic will contribute to increased stress and resignations as health workers. This is in line with the research of Kwaghe et al., (2021) who expressed frustration and sometimes wanted to quit their job. Higher perceived COVID-19 risk and induced psychological distress were associated with burnout among healthcare employees. Burnout is usually caused by prolonged stress at work and is associated with unfriendly working conditions, which have an adverse effect on employee performance [7]. in line with the research of De los Santos & Larague, (2021) showed that the perceived risk and fear of contracting the virus resulted in demotivation and low morale among employees. In addition, absenteeism from work is usually caused by the psychological pressure felt to work meet the demands of work, work discomfort, excessive workload, and long working hours. Working in the midst of media and everyone's attention, the long duration of work may not be unprecedented for health workers triggering negative psychological effects on work outcomes. Psychological effects that are felt are emotional disturbances, depression, stress, bad moods, panic attacks, phobias, symptoms of insomnia and emotional exhaustion (Handayani et al., 2020).

C.     COVID 19 handling training

       The results of the study [9] stated that almost all doctors reported obtaining information on COVID 19 from institutional or professional sources, 46% from newspapers and TV. Almost half reported having received training for telephone triage, while only 14% received formal training in the management of COVID 19. The results of this study are not in line with the research conducted by Kotian et al., (2020) who conducted a study on COVID-19 based on knowledge and understanding among the public. medical imaging professionals, where they reported that only 46.5% of participants had received training in the safe use of PPE.

1.         Risk factors for anxiety during COVID 19

2.         Become a health worker

     The results of the study [1] most of the health workers fell ill due to COVID 19 but they considered the risk of infection as part of their job. Significantly higher percentage of staff, more conflict among coworkers, increased workload, unusual extra tasks and greater fear of infection. This is in line with the research of Kwaghe et al., (2021) Accepting COVID-19 assignments is mostly expressed as a call to duty based on specialization. They felt it was something they had to do. However, this is not without initial fear and anxiety as expressed by some respondents. The results of the study [3] that the risk factors for anxiety were significantly related to the lack of training in controlling infection. In contrast, severe stress levels are only associated with existing medical problems. This is because medical practitioners on the front lines of the fight against the virus are experiencing traumatic events arising from the patient's condition and high mortality rate. There have been reports of traumatic stress among medical practitioners in the fight against COVID 19, including cases of medical practitioners taking their lives. This is in line with research by Susanti et al., (2020) showing that health workers have a strong sense of responsibility and teamwork when facing great pressure from heavy workloads, lack of protective equipment and feelings of helplessness with patients. The results of the research on risk factors for anxiety that occur due to the limited availability of health resources and lack of training on pandemic management are the reasons for higher levels of health workers in Pakistan. article [7] also shows that most of the medical workers experiencing high levels of fatigue amid the COVID pandemic adjusting to new work schedules. The risk of infection of health workers can be reduced by adequate precautions in health facilities. Primarily, this involves the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) including gowns, gloves, face masks, and face shields or goggles. Carefully putting on and taking off this equipment remains the main defense, but requires adequate training and supervision. Findings from the article [8] extension of health care emergencies requiring sustained high levels of workload in the context of continued uncertainty on the effectiveness of safety procedures and clinical management protocols have led to a significant increase in symptoms of depression and fatigue among healthcare workers. This is in line with the research of Ran et al., (2020) The risk of infection in health workers seems to be related to shift duration and hand hygiene. Longer working hours have a widespread negative influence on mental health. While excessive working hours have become commonplace under disease outbreaks, the health staff is very fragile, with mental health so fragile it needs to be recognized as soon as possible to avoid further harm. Long work duration triggers negative psychological effects including emotional disturbance, depression, stress, low mood, irritability, panic attacks, phobias, symptoms, insomnia, anger, and emotional exhaustion (Brooks et al., 2020).

3.         Community stigma

       Stigmatization, fear of infection, and perception of high risk to their work. This is an issue of great concern to medical care workers in the COVID-19 outbreak and other similar pandemics, and has been shown to be associated with adverse psychological outcomes [2]. In line with the study of Miconi et al., (2021) health workers reported 17.3% of the sample reported having experienced discrimination related to COVID 19, with the highest prevalence reported by East and South Asian participants.

       The results of the article [3] reported the absence of social support. In addition, the absence of social support can be attributed to the lack of security measures taken by health agencies to protect their staff, thus resulting. psychological tension of the participants, as they not only face the threat of fighting the pandemic, but also from being attacked. In line with research Adhikari et al., (2021) found that frontline worker status was associated with stigma so that frontline workers were three times more likely to experience stigma compared to those who did not work in the frontline. Infectious disease outbreaks have been found to cause stigma among health care workers.

     The global health emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a social crisis marked by discriminatory behavior and stigma against people who are considered suspects, diagnosed, or survivors of the virus. Ironically, despite their role in treating COVID-19 sufferers, health workers are no exception to being stigmatized (Bagcchi, 2020).

     Around the world, health workers also experience negative actions that are a result of stigmatization, such as harassment and violent attacks inside and outside their workplace which are exacerbated by long working hours, psychological stress, burnout, and job burnout that are often attached to work. they. Stigma and harassment leading to intimidation and violence against health workers. These acts of violence have been shown to increase stress levels and, consequently, exacerbate the psychological sequelae of moral injury. People who have experienced discrimination and stigma are at high risk for mental illness, including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicide (Brewis et al., 2020)

4.    Limited access to mental health services

The results of the article [6] revealed the lack of availability of psychologists and psychiatrists for psychological treatment for distressed medical personnel, including less personalized sources of support such as psychological materials andpsychological resources available from the media. The availability of psychologists and psychiatrists positively contributes to reducing mental health problems and physical discomfort caused by risk factors such as exposure to close contact with COVID 19. This is not in line with the research of Kang et al., (2020) where in China psychological assistance (consisting of volunteers) who had received training in psychological assistance in dealing with the pandemic provided telephone guidance to help with mental health issues.Hundreds of medical workers received these interventions, with good response, and their provision extended to more people and hospitals.

The number of people suffering from mental health impacts after the COVID-19 event is greater than the number of people who are physically injured, and mental health effects can last much longer. Nonetheless, mental health attracts far fewer personnel for planning and resources (Allsopp et al., 2019). The Global Mental Health Commission's observation that the use of digital technology can provide a variety of mental health interventions (Patel et al., 2018).

Psychological advice and guidance in printed resources and disseminated in the media can provide a level of protection for medical and nursing staff, improve mental health by reducing the impact of stress caused by a high risk of infection (West et al., 2014)

 

Conclusion

The results of the 9 articles that have been reviewed by researchers are the impact of COVID 19 on health workers and risk factors for anxiety during the COVID 19 period. The impact of COVID on health workers is anxiety and depression, negative work results and training in handling COVID. The factors that cause COVID are being a health worker, community stigma and limited access to mental health services.

 

Bibliography

 

Adhikari, S. P., Rawal, N., Shrestha, D. B., Budhathoki, P., Banmala, S., Awal, S., Bhandari, G., Poudel, R., & Parajuli, A. R. (2021). Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stigma in Healthcare Workers in Nepal During Later Phase of First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey. Cureus, 13(6). Google Scholar

 

Allsopp, K., Brewin, C. R., Barrett, A., Williams, R., Hind, D., Chitsabesan, P., & French, P. (2019). Responding to mental health needs after terror attacks. The BMJ, 366(August), 4–7. Google Scholar

 

Antonijevic, J., Binic, I., Zikic, O., Manojlovic, S., Tosic-Golubovic, S., & Popovic, N. (2020). Mental health of medical personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain and Behavior, 10(12), 1–9. Google Scholar

 

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616. Google Scholar

 

Arshad, M. S., Hussain, I., Nafees, M., Majeed, A., Imran, I., Saeed, H., Hashmi, F. K., Akbar, M., Abrar, M. A., Ramzan, B., Chaudhry, M. O., Islam, M., Usman, A., Nisar, N., & Rasool, M. F. (2020). Assessing the impact of covid-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers in three metropolitan cities of pakistan. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 1047–1055. Google Scholar

 

Bagcchi, S. (2020). Stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 20(7), 782. Google Scholar

 

Brewis, A., Wutich, A., & Mahdavi, P. (2020). Stigma, pandemics, and human biology: Looking back, looking forward. American Journal of Human Biology, 32(5), 1–6. Google Scholar

 

Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal, January. Google Scholar

 

Chidiebere Okechukwu, E., Tibaldi, L., & la Torre, G. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of Nurses. Clinica Terapeutica, 171(5), e399–e400. Google Scholar

 

De los Santos, J. A. A., & Labrague, L. J. (2021). The impact of fear of COVID-19 on job stress, and turnover intentions of frontline nurses in the community: A cross-sectional study in the Philippines. Traumatology, 27(1), 52–59. Google Scholar

 

Di Tella, M., Romeo, A., Benfante, A., & Castelli, L. (2020). Mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(6), 1583–1587. Google Scholar

 

Dubey, S., Biswas, P., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Dubey, M. J., Chatterjee, S., Lahiri, D., & Lavie, C. J. (2020). Impacto Psicossocial do Covid-19. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 14(5), 779–788. Google Scholar

 

El-hage, W., Hingray, C., Lemogne, C., Yrondi, A., Brunault, P., & Bienvenu, T. (2020). Health professionals faced with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: what are the risks for their mental health? Encephale, 46 (3)(January), S73 – S80. Google Scholar

 

Frajerman, A., Colle, R., Hozer, F., & Deflesselle, E. (2020). Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information . January. Google Scholar

 

Gupta, A. K., Mehra, A., Niraula, A., Kafle, K., Deo, S. P., Singh, B., Sahoo, S., & Grover, S. (2020). Prevalence of anxiety and depression among the healthcare workers in Nepal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 54. Google Scholar

 

Handayani, R. T., Kuntari, S., Darmayanti, A. T., Widiyanto, A., & Atmojo, J. T. (2020). Faktor Penyebab Stres Pada Tenaga Kesehatan dan Masyarakat Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa, 8(3), 353. Google Scholar

 

Hasibuan, A. N. (2020). Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Stress Petugas Kesehatan Daam Penanganan Covid-19). Google Scholar

 

Huang, Y., & Zhao, N. (2020). Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID- 19 . The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information. Esliver Psychiatry ResearchPsychiatry Research, 288(January), 2–3. Google Scholar

 

Kan L, Ma S, Chen M, Yang J, Wang Y, Li R, & Yao L. (2020). Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun. [revista en Internet] 2020 [acceso 6 de mayo de 2022]; 2020(1), 1–8. Google Scholar

 

Kang, L., Li, Y., Hu, S., Chen, M., Yang, C., Yang, B. X., Wang, Y., Hu, J., Lai, J., Ma, X., Chen, J., Guan, L., Wang, G., Ma, H., & Liu, Z. (2020). The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(3), e14. Google Scholar

 

Khanal, P., Devkota, N., Dahal, M., Paudel, K., & Joshi, D. (2020). Mental health impacts among health workers during COVID-19 in a low resource setting: A cross-sectional survey from Nepal. Globalization and Health, 16(1), 1–12. Google Scholar

 

Kotian, R. P., Faujdar, D., Kotian, S. P., & Brayal, D. (2020). article 1. Kotian2020_Article_KnowledgeAndUnderstandingAmong. 1415–1420. Google Scholar

 

Kwaghe, A. V., Kwaghe, V. G., Habib, Z. G., Kwaghe, G. V., Ilesanmi, O. S., Ekele, B. A., Umeokonkwo, C. D., & Balogun, M. S. (2021). Stigmatization and psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on frontline healthcare Workers in Nigeria: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 1–17. Google Scholar

 

Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Porru, S., Carta, A., Tardivo, S., Bovo, C., Ruggeri, M., & Amaddeo, F. (2021). Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a highly burdened area of north-east Italy. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 30. Google Scholar

 

Lasalvia, A., Rigon, G., Rugiu, C., Negri, C., Del Zotti, F., Amaddeo, F., & Bonetto, C. (2022). The psychological impact of COVID-19 among primary care physicians in the province of Verona, Italy: a cross-sectional study during the first pandemic wave. Family Practice, 39(1), 65–73. Google Scholar

 

Miconi, D., Li, Z. Y., Frounfelker, R. L., Santavicca, T., Cénat, J. M., Venkatesh, V., & Rousseau, C. (2021). Ethno-cultural disparities in mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study on the impact of exposure to the virus and COVID-19-related discrimination and stigma on mental health across ethno-cultural groups in Quebec (Canada). BJPsych Open, 7(1), 1–10. Google Scholar

 

Moyo, N., Bhappu, A. D., Bhebhe, M., & Ncube, F. (2022). Perceived Risk of COVID-19 and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6762. Google Scholar

 

Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D., Collins, P. Y., Cooper, J. L., Eaton, J., Herrman, H., Herzallah, M. M., Huang, Y., Jordans, M. J. D., Kleinman, A., Medina-Mora, M. E., Morgan, E., Niaz, U., Omigbodun, O.,UnÜtzer, Jü. (2018). The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet, 392(10157), 1553–1598. Google Scholar

 

Preti, E., Di Mattei, V., Perego, G., Ferrari, F., Mazzetti, M., Taranto, P., Di Pierro, R., Madeddu, F., & Calati, R. (2020). The Psychological Impact of Epidemic and Pandemic Outbreaks on Healthcare Workers: Rapid Review of the Evidence. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(8). Google Scholar

 

Priyatna, H., Mu’in, M., Naviati, E., & Sudarmiati, S. (2021). Gambaran Tingkat Kecemasan dan Stres Kerja Tenaga Kesehatan Puskesmas Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Holistic Nursing and Health Science, 4(2), 74–82. Google Scholar

 

Qasem Surrati, A. M., Asad Mansuri, F. M., & Ayadh Alihabi, A. A. (2020). Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 15(6), 536–543. Google Scholar

 

Ran, L., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Wu, W., Zhang, L., & Tan, X. (2020). Risk Factors of Healthcare Workers with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Designated Hospital of Wuhan in China. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(16), 2218–2221. Google Scholar

 

Si, M., Su, X., Jiang, Y., Wang, W., Gu, X., Ma, L., Li, J., Zhang, S., Ren, Z.-F., Liu, Y.-L., & Qiao, Y.-L. (2020). The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Care Workers in China. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–13. Google Scholar

 

Susanti, S. S., Rachmalia, & Mayasari, P. (2020). Book Chapter: Advances in Community And Disaster Nursing: Pencegahan dan Penatalaksanaan Keperawatan COVID-19. The Lancet Global Health, April, 19–21. Google Scholar

 

West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Rabatin, J. T., Call, T. G., Davidson, J. H., Multari, A., Romanski, S. A., Henriksen Hellyer, J. M., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2014). Intervention to promote physicianwell-being, job satisfaction, and professionalism a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(4), 527–533. Google Scholar

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


Copyright holder:

Lezi Mayang Sari, Mufdlilah, Mamnu’ah (2022)

 

First publication right:

Jurnal Health Sains

 

This article is licensed under: